Ex-FBI Chief INDICTED Over Assassination Threat?

Person wearing FBI jacket, letters in yellow.
FORMER FBI CHIEF INDICTED

James Comey, once the nation’s top cop, now faces federal indictment over beach seashells spelling out what critics call a blatant assassination code against President Trump.

Story Snapshot

  • Federal grand jury indicts Comey in North Carolina over “86 47” seashell Instagram post interpreted as threat to assassinate Trump, the 47th president.
  • Comey deletes post, claims ignorance of violent “86” slang meaning “get rid of” or kill, but Trump dismisses denial as unbelievable.
  • Secret Service probes amid two prior Trump assassination attempts; ties into long Trump-Comey feud from 2017 firing.
  • No formal charges confirmed earlier, but DOJ renews prosecution after prior case dismissal, heightening accountability demands.

Comey’s Seashell Post Ignites Firestorm

James Comey posted an Instagram photo last year showing seashells arranged as “86 47” on a beach walk. He captioned it a cool formation. Trump allies, including Tulsi Gabbard, immediately branded it a public call to assassinate Trump, the 47th president. “86” slang means eject or kill someone.

Comey deleted the post within hours after backlash erupted. Secret Service launched inquiries, citing the post’s timing after two Trump assassination attempts.

Trump-Comey Feud Fuels Interpretation Clash

Donald Trump fired Comey in 2017 over the Russia probe and Clinton email handling. That antagonism resurfaced with the post. Trump stated Comey knew exactly what it meant, adding a child would understand the threat. Comey responded he opposed all violence and never linked the numbers to harm.

Critics question his FBI background makes ignorance implausible. Common sense aligns with Trump’s view: ex-FBI directors grasp threat nuances, especially post-rallies where bullets flew.

Grand Jury Indictment Marks Escalation

A federal grand jury in North Carolina’s Eastern District indicted Comey on threat charges. DOJ prosecutors revived the case after a judge tossed unrelated prior indictment. Sources confirm the seashell image as central evidence.

FBI Director Kash Patel noted the grand jury reviewed Comey’s deletion and apology yet proceeded. Prosecutors must prove a true threat under Supreme Court standards from 2023, showing Comey knew it would seem threatening.

Comey told MSNBC “86” meant ditching a place to him as a kid. Gabbard demanded he go behind bars. Trump predicted prosecution last year, stressing no one escapes accountability after attempts on his life.

Legal and Political Ramifications Unfold

Short-term, Comey faces court battles testing free speech limits on ambiguous symbols. Long-term, it reinforces distrust in ex-intelligence officials and sets precedents for social media scrutiny. Trump supporters cheer renewed DOJ focus under his administration.

Opponents call it overreach, but facts support investigation: high-profile figure, loaded slang, post-assassination context.

Politically, the case amplifies security debates for Trump’s presidency. Socially, it chills coded online expression amid real threats. No economic fallout noted, but partisan divides deepen. Broader effects include heightened vigilance on public figures’ posts, aligning with common-sense threat prevention.

Sources:

James Comey indicted again, this time over seashell Instagram post

James Comey indicted over 2025 seashell post